Social class has become an ever changing definition of prestige amongst British society. It was once the formation that set apart cultures and societies so everyone knew their place. The higher classes of course were all for social class as they help a higher social standing than that of their lower class associates. Holding a higher social class meant that you had money, a nice house and a good education. Whereas if you were of a lower class you worked to get by, sent your children to public school and had a house that was.....Humble...to say the least., However there are many variable to determine social class, such as income, family background and occupation. The perception of status is an illustration to portray prestige and social standing amongst society.
Solomon suggests that social class is 'determined by a complex set of variables, including income, family background and occupation.' (Solomon, 2006). Although this may have been true to previous years it is somewhat easy to change social class, whether it is through a promotion of a new job or marrying into a higher social classed family. When a child is born they inherited the class of their family however due to many couples either being separated or unmarried the child may then belong to more than one social class and value themselves to their closest parent. Meaning there is room to change social class where as in some cultures and societies the class you are associated with will be carries on for many generations to come.
A prime example of division in social class amongst education was in schools; if you went to a public school you tended to play football as a sport or hobby and were part of the leagues in your bourough. Whereas if you went to private school rugby was their sport rather than football. I find this ironic as in society today rugby players get paid a marginal amount in comparison to that of a football player, this could be argues is a reflection in class of the sport as glory (football) or fine participation (rugby)
Although this applies more to previous years in Britain, older generation still use social class as a divide between themselves and others “Until the 1980s the concept of social class, linking economic role, social identity and political affiliation, was almost unanimously seen as central… in the UK” http://www.ucel.ac.uk/shield/docs/notes_class.pdf . With social class comes an air of stereotypes. People perceive certain people to belong to a certain social class depending on their age and profession. Those who work in supermarkets or do laboured work are seen to be from a lower class as they are not classically trained in their field of work. 'A person's occupation tends to be strongly linked to his or her use of leisure time, allocation of family resources, political orientation and so on, this variable is often considered to be the single best indicator of social class.' (Solomon, 2006). However nowadays a plumber can earn three times the amount of someone from a skilled profession but they are seen as “blue collared workers” and a white collared worker is that of either a lawyer, doctor...someone who has been professionally trained. http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/white-blue-green-collar/
Social class comes with duties to act and portray you in a certain manner; however it is these mannerisms that make the mixing of social class somewhat uncomfortable. This comes to everyone “knowing their place” in society and not talking out of turn.
Social class is put into bands as such:
A B C1 C2 D E
• A – upper middle class
This is someone in a high managerial role such as a CEO of a company or Director.
• B - middle class
Someone who has trained professionally, could be a lawyer or consultant
• C1 – lower middle class
Consists of jobs at a Junior Manager level
• C2 – skilled working class
This category consists of manual laborer such as construction workers and plumbers.
• D – working class
Slightly or unskilled labourer
• E –lower class
Unemployed
Marketers use social class as a platform to appeal to their target audience, this is where associated brands come from. Higher end brands hold a prestige of the higher classes as they are the people who are supposed to use and of course afford them. On the other hand classes have meshed in this category as the lower classes now aspire for those high end products. For example when looking at expenditure many of the lower classes don’t have the opportunity to spend money on desirable product. Therefore marketing companies know there is no point promoting a product to lower classes if they cannot afford it. When researching buying behaviours on Netquest it was clear that those of higher social classes spent less on cosmetics in a month in comparison to that of lower. However it was mostly the younger generations that spent the most. See for yourself...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9AKW6T6Yog